ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
if MV win, then we face SFC in the SF.
Red card is correct, though even if in the box, should still have been a red - a charge in the back isn't a possibility of playing the ball.
Looks like a pretty clear foul to me. Clear charge in the back. And in that position....any foul is a red. Doesn't have to be a bad foul for DOGSO
Have to take care of the Smurfs at some stage. May as well do it now
We no. Not if smurfs play Nux. Nux have a style to totally negate smurfs. We're yet to prove it.
Cept the team we lost the most games to.... 0-3 on competitive fixtures and not shown what we showed late against citeh last year.
City have a handy squad too. And they want revenge for last year.
At what point is the ball coming off your chest and bouncing 5m away and away from goal a clear goalscoring opportunity.
While i agree is the push in the back the reason it went 5m away
