kjamn rose
New Member
Some good points there Einstein and nothing really to disagree with, except the bit about some of the time constraints. Nobody knew until the October 15 announcement what competition they would be playing in. Most, especially those that ended up in PL1 had a reasonable idea that is where they would be. Parramatta would've realistically expected to be dropped (as they were) and the only other clubs in any sort of danger were Rockdale and South Coast Wolves. The only realistic contenders to replace those 3 teams were Central Coast, Northern Tigers and Sydney Uni. My point is that they should have been preparing to be in PL1 from the time they put in there submission. Scouting and recruiting the best players and coaches and having them committed, conditional upon entry into PL1. Blacktown City, Spartans, Manly, Olympic and Sutherland all had their trial dates organised dependent on the announcement, as well as having most of their players and coaches in place.
As you rightly pointed out most of the coaching appointments at CCMA were handed out on the basis of last year's performance, which despite winning the club championship, was overall down on the previous year when comparing the results of individual teams (except the 16s).
You are right - the whle program needs the support of everyne involved, but the closed shop mentality and amateurish approach has got to go. As Mumbles has said - we can't afford to f@#k it up this time.
The 'closed shop mentality' really annoys me and seems to be continuing, if not possibly worsening, under the new DOC. Whenever any process (especially selections, trials, etc) are so 'secret' and are not transparent, then it does make me wonder why? And 'what' is being 'hidden' or not disclosed?
To me, processes or procedures that aren't open or transparent are usually that way for a reason. Such as, they could handle public scrutiny, the people running them are either inept, corrupt, and/or strong nepotism supporters! I don't know why selections and trials can simply be based on merit and the best players being picked, rather than all of the other 'garbage' that goes on!
For example, a number of A League clubs have openly published their trial information for their NYL teams, have conducted their trials, openly. To date, nothing seems to have been made public about CCM NYL?
So, those in charge of things shouldn't be surprised when their selections are finally made public, and there are a few that are highly dubious!
I wonder how many Newcastle people are going to 'land on our shores' with the new DOC having close Newcastle ties, and already bring in players to CCMA teams from up that way?
It will be interesting to note whether the senior management focus on poaching or coaching?
With CCM seemingly being closely aligned with the new International Football School at Kariong, coupled with their also apparent little open support to the CCMA, I also wonder if CCM long term plans are to go more 'solo' away from CCF and CCMA? And run their own development training, selections, etc?
Here's a couple of relevant links:
http://www.marinersdevelopment.com.au/
http://www.footballaustralia.com.au/perthglory/news-display/YOUTH-Team-Trials/67897
http://www.footballaustralia.com.au/melbourneheart/news-display/Heart-to-conduct-NYL-road-show/68599