Wk9 Other Games

[scottmac]

Because it came off Broxhams leg / foot.

From my recollection. Bear in mind I'd had a couple of beers by that point.
I'd argue the other night with Rowles. The penalty wasn't given at the time.
When the ref checked it on VAR you couldn't tell if it hit Rowles in the face or his foot before his hand.
Therefore there wasn't enough proof to overturn the original decision.

It wasn't given in our game. The VAR overruled (which is the match ref today) but didn't today. If it was questionable you can't over rule

 

[Big Al]

Beautiful pass for that goal

 

[scottmac]

On another note, this has got to be the worst game of football I've seen for some time

 

[Tevor]

On another note, this has got to be the worst game of football I've seen for some time

Agree and Scum deserved the goal as they had a clear Pen not given. Feels good seeing MVC so bad and no end in sight, given them the spoon now. Cruse can have another cry.

 

[scottmac]

Agree and Scum deserved the goal as they had a clear Pen not given. Feels good seeing MVC so bad and no end in sight, given them the spoon now. Cruse can have another cry.

Both teams have had legitimate pens denied. It was always going to happen. When they should be given they're not but when it's the Mariners f**k it. No one will care.

 

[Huddo]

Bremner is dead, he's got no support from players after the game, 1 more loss his done

 

[Huddo]

Both teams have had legitimate pens denied. It was always going to happen. When they should be given they're not but when it's the Mariners f**k it. No one will care.

Ams is reffing for his career, the whistle was going in the pocket. Steb would have told him er on the side of defence.

 

[Pirate Pete]

It wasn't given in our game. The VAR overruled (which is the match ref today) but didn't today. If it was questionable you can't over rule

I said it wasn't given.
And technically the ref gave the third penalty after going to the sideline.
It was not given by the VAR ref.
You're obviously not getting the point of what I'm saying.
Nevermind.

 

[scottmac]

I said it wasn't given.
And technically the ref gave the third penalty after going to the sideline.
It was not given by the VAR ref.
You're obviously not getting the point of what I'm saying.
Nevermind.

No he didn't give it. Ams called it back. It was already play on. Without ams that game ends 2 all. Ams was in the ref's ear while watching the replay you can see him talking to Ams. It was given by the var otherwise we wouldn't have gone back for it.
The only way the ref gets a second look is if Ams thinks its a dead set pen.

 

[Huddo]

The way Alireza Faghani controls the game , he's a step up on the refs

 

[scottmac]

The way Alireza Faghani controls the game , he's a step up on the refs

100%. Quality and pace a bit up on the last game too

 

[Huddo]

I put a pineapple on the wanderers, and am chasing big losses this weekend thanks to the first game, but right now I'm pretty happy wanderers are losing.

 

[Pirate Pete]

No he didn't give it. Ams called it back. It was already play on. Without ams that game ends 2 all. Ams was in the ref's ear while watching the replay you can see him talking to Ams. It was given by the var otherwise we wouldn't have gone back for it.
The only way the ref gets a second look is if Ams thinks its a dead set pen.

As I said in my original post. THE PENALTY WASN'T GIVEN.
You then replied..... It wasn't given in our game.
Ams called it back but....
the ref was called to the sideline to look at the monitor.
He gave it not Ams.
As I said you obviously didn't read my first post properly.

 

[scottmac]

As I said in my original post. THE PENALTY WASN'T GIVEN.
You then replied..... It wasn't given in our game.
Ams called it back but....
the ref was called to the sideline to look at the monitor.
He gave it not Ams.
As I said you obviously didn't read my first post properly.

Maybe you didn't make sense in your first post.

Because it came off Broxhams leg / foot.

From my recollection. Bear in mind I'd had a couple of beers by that point.
I'd argue the other night with Rowles. The penalty wasn't given at the time.
When the ref checked it on VAR you couldn't tell if it hit Rowles in the face or his foot before his hand.
Therefore there wasn't enough proof to overturn the original decision.

Your arguing the Rowles decision when there's doubt and saying there not enough proof to overturn a decision that wasn't made. What exactly were you trying to say?

 

[Huddo]

Cant wait to hear Carl talk about how the Wanderers are only getting started again

 

[Tevor]

Well done fire chickens by keeping the cap rorters to a draw.

 

[style_cafe]

Riddle me this Batman.."Is the conversation between the referee and the VAR recorded?
if not why not?
If so, then why can`t it be replayed so the fans can clearly understand why a penalty is given.

As it stands in my mind ,the conversation goes something like this on the 3rd penalty.

Hey Fieldo, I think i`ve got something in that last scramble".
Rowles handles the ball,it`s not conclusive ,but it might get us across the line.
Ok Ammo let me have a look.
Hey Ammo it looks like it comes off his leg up into his face. I`m not even sure it hits his arm.
Well it maybe the last chance to f**k up the Mariners.
f**kem! what`s one more penalty!

Prove me wrong...

 

[FFC Mariner]

"Ammo, hows that multi looking"
"I tipped Adelaide"
"Shit, hang on mate, I've got this"

 

[turbo]

Watching the nix wsw game tonight I can’t help but think our small cohort who copped a hard time for standing and singing will be feeling aggrieved.
@priorpeter ?

 

[true believer]

I never want a MV result

i reckon bremner has one game left.