ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
zycie said:goalman to the rescue
FFC Mariner said:But Mick, the same applies to the Kiwis doesnt it?
FFC Mariner said:But Mick, the same applies to the Kiwis doesnt it?
serious14 said:bulldogmariner said:
Strange that the referee let the second goal stand considering some arseclown jumped the fence, ran on and tapped it in?? Where was security??
goingtoadisco said:Holman was also set up the 1st goal... sort of. Would say he played well but there was that 20 M pass to no one/ no where.
marinermick said:goingtoadisco said:Holman was also set up the 1st goal... sort of. Would say he played well but there was that 20 M pass to no one/ no where.
The first goal was set up because Culina ran the ball twenty metres sideways, got tackled, and the ball deflected over to Vidosic.
To say Goalman had a hand in it is drawing a very, very, very long bow.
bulldogmariner said:Did you watch the same game? Yeah I would find it hard to pick my final 23 as we only have about 14 good players. 4 of those didnt play tonight.Jerome said:Im sorry but pim nockers can pack their bags and F((( off home, granted that first half was woeful *Milligan*, but that second half i havent seen since Guus left the fold, It was fantastic to watch the young'ns moving like that, but to be fair, on the whites for bringing the game on straight up should have been 1-1, and that alst goal probably means lolman is on the plane. . .
im finding it hard to pick my 23. . .
marinermick said:goingtoadisco said:Holman was also set up the 1st goal... sort of. Would say he played well but there was that 20 M pass to no one/ no where.
The first goal was set up because Culina ran the ball twenty metres sideways, got tackled, and the ball deflected over to Vidosic.
To say Goalman had a hand in it is drawing a very, very, very long bow.
Sym said:why should pim take carle ?
I thought Neil was good, miles above.
Moore is a tad old and clubless, Meggsy fitted in well.
Mcdonald was also one of the best in the first half
that's saying something..
Wombat said:Sym said:why should pim take carle ?
I thought Neil was good, miles above.
Moore is a tad old and clubless, Meggsy fitted in well.
Mcdonald was also one of the best in the first half
that's saying something..
I would have taken Carle as apart from Kewell there is no quality in the final third. Carle gives you quality and a key to unlock tight defences.
I'd tip that if he had played 16 games as striker (not his normal possie) he would have scored several times.
I'm not saying that McDonald wont become a good international player but he's shite atm in the current team set up.
marinermick said:Apparently Carle is dreadfully unfit. Pim conducted a beep test to assess the fitness of the players and sunbed failed miserably.