Jesus said:
That said i still think we had a team that could and should have won. If not for an inexperienced mullen letting his player past, and some dissapointing finishing we would have won.
actually the goal itself should have been disallowed. while mullen was well beaten, there was a player clearly offside, and while he didn't touch the ball himself, he was clearly influencing the movement of both the defenders in the area and the keeper. when robbie says 'galekovic can't come for that' - he says it's because it's too flat but he's also trying to keep half an eye on the offside man. that's offside.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfBO3TnQfpQ
nevertheless, we should have been pumped 4-0, so i'm not going to whinge too hard about that.
Razorback said:
dibo said:
Razorback said:
Of course because Lawire's selections in recent games have been spot on! Wake up to yourself.
Did I say that? I said that the two situations aren't directly comparable.
If you think they are, feel free to make an argument to explain why.
Your whole arguement was based on selections. All I have said is that Lawrie's selections in the past have been questionable also, thus comparable!
Just once it would be nice to read a post from you that wasn't completely brown nosing the gaffer or the club! Especially in recent times as there have been nothing to be excited about from the club. Its so frustating to read! And every post seems to be "well look at the bright side, we are not newcastle" or some crap like that!
I talked about selections, but I disagree that my 'whole arguement' (sic) was based on selections. I also talked about the fact that Lawrie's got a very limited list to draw from, Pim doesn't. It's the national team FFS - Pim can call players in from anywhere, Lawrie can't. If Pim wanted bloody Tim Cahill playing, he could have made it happen.
Frankly I'm getting sick of people who don't get that we (the Mariners and the A-League as a whole) don't have unlimited money and players at our disposal and somehow expect that we're going to be able to seamlessly cover the loss of our best player.
The reality check is this - the A-League operates on a very limited budget and from a very limited pool of players. For all the talk of coaching revolutions and other assorted things there is a simple fact that cannot be avoided - we (at the league level, and certainly at our club) can't compete for the level of players and coaches that people seem to want.
Only one club made a profit this year. That's after four years. AFAIK there have been four profit results issued in the entire history of the league (three to Melobourne, one to us). That's 28 loss results. There's not enough money going in at the moment from sponsorship, gates and whatever else to move balance sheets forward at present.
The youth league is up, and this will deliver players over time. Youth development programs are being run with a bit more professionalism by State federations, and this will deliver players over time.
But to get better players in the A-League immediately needs more money, pure and simple. Jonas Salley is an ordinary player in the A-League but he's off to China for more money than we'd be paying anybody. That's the reality of it. Without a higher cap, we're losing quality. Welcome to the free market. There has to be an injection of hard cash before we can do things like bump up the cap.
It's not exciting, it's not inspiring, but that's football. This is what's under the glitter and shine. You can all wring your hands and have a whinge, but there are simple reasons why the league as a whole (and our club in particular) loses players and can't replace them with stars. No amount of whinging about the gaffer will change anything.