Nathan Byrn
Well-Known Member
[/quote]
1.The FFA has restricted the clubs ability to generate funds through external partners.Please explain?
2.The clubs have lost confidence in the FFA and Ben Buckley.Which clubs? FFA organise/assists buyouts for Adelaide, Brisbane,Wellington,Perth, Newcastle (to a person with a long history of arguments with partners eg ask Anthony Cummings)Part own Mariners. The point, if left unassisted by FFA the comp would be gone already. Unfortunately someone has to make one of these clubs work as a finanical model for the rest to copy. And im available to take control.
[/quote]
1.Do I really have to explain all this. Can't people on this forum do some research? Read some articles etc.
I don't mean to be rude towards you, but surely you have read in the past that clubs have not been able to proceed with partnership deals because it conflicts with FFA agreements.
2. Perth, Wellington, Gold Coast, North Queeensland, Western Sydney, Adelaide, Newcastle, Melbourne Victory and Heart. The clubs all want an independent body to run the game, go and read the Crawford report! It recommends an indepent body to run the A-League and this is what the clubs want. A "panel" has been set up with three clubs being involved and three from the FFA, the "panel" is considered by the clubs. The clubs also want the A-League model changed, the dictatorial model that is in place is archaic and HAS to be changed. The clubs have lost confidence in Ben Buckley and the FFA's ability to run the A-League but have no avenue to voice that other than by extreme measures or by meeting with Ben Buckley and Frank Lowy!!
Just because the FFA has bailed out clubs, don't assume the club sthen in turn support the current A-League model or the FFA. If anything THAT is a clear indication of the failings of the FFA and the owners want a change.
1.The FFA has restricted the clubs ability to generate funds through external partners.Please explain?
2.The clubs have lost confidence in the FFA and Ben Buckley.Which clubs? FFA organise/assists buyouts for Adelaide, Brisbane,Wellington,Perth, Newcastle (to a person with a long history of arguments with partners eg ask Anthony Cummings)Part own Mariners. The point, if left unassisted by FFA the comp would be gone already. Unfortunately someone has to make one of these clubs work as a finanical model for the rest to copy. And im available to take control.
[/quote]
1.Do I really have to explain all this. Can't people on this forum do some research? Read some articles etc.
I don't mean to be rude towards you, but surely you have read in the past that clubs have not been able to proceed with partnership deals because it conflicts with FFA agreements.
2. Perth, Wellington, Gold Coast, North Queeensland, Western Sydney, Adelaide, Newcastle, Melbourne Victory and Heart. The clubs all want an independent body to run the game, go and read the Crawford report! It recommends an indepent body to run the A-League and this is what the clubs want. A "panel" has been set up with three clubs being involved and three from the FFA, the "panel" is considered by the clubs. The clubs also want the A-League model changed, the dictatorial model that is in place is archaic and HAS to be changed. The clubs have lost confidence in Ben Buckley and the FFA's ability to run the A-League but have no avenue to voice that other than by extreme measures or by meeting with Ben Buckley and Frank Lowy!!
Just because the FFA has bailed out clubs, don't assume the club sthen in turn support the current A-League model or the FFA. If anything THAT is a clear indication of the failings of the FFA and the owners want a change.