goingtoadisco said:footparent said:I must state that these were the most professional trials I have witnessed anywhere before. Pleayers did not just play SSG and then coaches selected based on their opinions alone or political etc.
1st sessions players were subjected to intense session of passing and movement etc, then were split in teams of 4 where two teams played 4v4 with goals and the other 2 were treated to 1v1, 2v2 and 4v4 with 2-3 touch poseesion game in front of the senior coach who runs CC FNSW, this bloke is brutally honest.
Second trials were all testing in 20M side passing, 20M instep drives, timed dribble, leg power, 20M sprints and various juggling techniques and as he states to remove subjectivity or his own opinions of some parents which have been bagging him for years and thus stats will not allow him to cut their kids etc, this is a very refreshing approach.
IMHO SSG own the way that this guy was trialing.
To be honest it sounds like session one was small sided games and these would have been productuve ,especialy 4v4. however session two seems pointless.
so what if one kid can sprint 20 meters faster then another then lay of a perfect 20 m side pass then juggle a ball for 2 minuets,he might be fantastic at all this but it does not meen that he can do it in a game.
This is just an opinion, but i am a huge fan of ssg as i believe they show what a player can realy do on the park.
SSG are great and I also know this guy very well and he did just that. It is crucial all other test as this not only can separate players whom are close or for whatever reason trialed badly, they are KIDS and sometime they do well and somertimes they don't. It at bare minimum removes subjectivity which us parents hate...
Passing, speed with ball and no ball, good touch can only add to vision, good game awareness as one has more time and thus easy to coach game awareness when all of the above is true.
Anyway you and I will always disagree cause I feel all is relevant in our game