ccmfans.net is the Central Coast Mariners fan community, and was formed in 2004, so basically the beginning of time for the Mariners. Things have changed a lot over the years, but one thing has remained constant and that is our love of the Mariners. People come and go, some like to post a lot and others just like to read. It's up to you how you participate in the community!
If you want to get rid of this message, simply click on Join Now or head over to https://www.ccmfans.net/community/register/ to join the community! It only takes a few minutes, and joining will let you post your thoughts and opinions on all things Mariners, Football, and whatever else pops into your mind. If posting is not your thing, you can interact in other ways, including voting on polls, and unlock options only available to community members.
ccmfans.net is not only for Mariners fans either. Most of us are bonded by our support for the Mariners, but if you are a fan of another club (except the Scum, come on, we need some standards), feel free to join and get into some banter.
There is something a bit distasteful about a property developer trying to pressure public officials to hand over an asset.
There is something a bit distasteful about a property developer trying to pressure public officials to hand over an asset.
It is a very poorly managed asset though. Still isn't the best taste though.There is something a bit distasteful about a property developer trying to pressure public officials to hand over an asset.
90% of the Councils entire Parks and Rec budget goes to the "upkeep" of CCS by all accounts.
As a ratepayer, that is unacceptable and cant continue. That budget needs to go to the playing fields that are in a terrible state all over the coast.
Just dont give it away to an absentee landlord intent on private profit
90% of the Councils entire Parks and Rec budget goes to the "upkeep" of CCS by all accounts.
As a ratepayer, that is unacceptable and cant continue. That budget needs to go to the playing fields that are in a terrible state all over the coast.
Just dont give it away to an absentee landlord intent on private profit
All before Shaun's time, but the Mariners havent always been the best tenant or partner with Council either.At one stage they weren't spending enough and the club put in $250,000 towards it. They also were using grass that was best suited to the NRL season and not summer.
it's the
If you don't, the team will have to leave pressure we can't afford after all the bad performances. That could be enough to kill both the club and the stadium.
If you can't afford to run the stadium, don't
No, wasn't saying you were saying thatI think you misunderstand - unless I'm misunderstanding you. The club isn't threatening to go - they're saying that they can't afford to risk not having a stadium at the end of this deal.
I am starting to think Charlesworth could be one of the best owners in the league.
He may have some wacky ideas at times but you cannot say he is sitting on his hands waiting for something to happen.
If we finish up owning the stadium and the coe we will be one of the best clubs in Asia for facilities.
We have a stated policy of developing youth and of using those players in our side and then on selling them.
There is something a bit distasteful about a property developer trying to pressure public officials to hand over an asset.
Entirely agree. But do you think that is an accurate and fair characterisation of Mike Charlesworth?