Huddo
Well-Known Member
No, I think he means there is a big difference in having enough evidence and cause to charge somebody, and subsequently having enough to proceed to a trial,
Correct me if I’m wrong.
But my point is you do not execute an arrest unless there is a belief that if it goes to trial there is enough evidence to prosecute a case.
Police would have had to engage with DPP or police prosecutors to ascertain whether there was chance of success.
Otherwise the arrest is a bluff at best, or a coersive tactic that was employed to destroy a mans career, and give false hope to the alleged victim at worst.
Last edited: