David Votoupal
Well-Known Member
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8361081.stm
Why hasn't the international community as a whole taken a harder line on Burma? The Burmese people have been held hostage by military rule continuously since 1962, resulting in a desperately impoverished and isolated country. What could be one of SE Asia's richest countries is one of the world's poorest, what used to be a major exporter of rice... struggles to feed its people. They in fact enjoy less freedom under military rule than they did under the 60-odd year period of British rule.
There's also the question of the very legitimacy and indeed legality of this junta. In 1990, Aung San Suu Kyi and her NLD won an overwhelming majority in elections, but the military refused to hand over power and the assembly could not convene. This means they are illegally squatting on the reins of government that should rightfully have been turned over to the NLD. A similar scenario, dare I say, to the Soviet takeover of central/eastern Europe.
Why hasn't the international community as a whole taken a harder line on Burma? The Burmese people have been held hostage by military rule continuously since 1962, resulting in a desperately impoverished and isolated country. What could be one of SE Asia's richest countries is one of the world's poorest, what used to be a major exporter of rice... struggles to feed its people. They in fact enjoy less freedom under military rule than they did under the 60-odd year period of British rule.
There's also the question of the very legitimacy and indeed legality of this junta. In 1990, Aung San Suu Kyi and her NLD won an overwhelming majority in elections, but the military refused to hand over power and the assembly could not convene. This means they are illegally squatting on the reins of government that should rightfully have been turned over to the NLD. A similar scenario, dare I say, to the Soviet takeover of central/eastern Europe.